5 FACTS ABOUT CLIMATE CHANGE SHARED BY AN ACTUAL CLIMATE SCIENTIST We at Collective Evolution are by no means �climate change deniers.� The climate has always changed, and will continue to change over time due to multiple factors and natural processes. But there is something fishy going on, and the undeniable fact still remains that most mainstream science is plagued with economic and political agendas, and is used to push policy and global elitist agendas. We must stop destroying our environment, polluting and not taking care of it. The problem is people have made exposing globalist agendas synonymous with denying climate change, and this can�t be further from the truth. It�s similar to the current vaccine controversy, in the sense that scientists who question the science put out by computer models, which is used to justify various policy decisions, are ridiculed by the mainstream. It�s claimed that �97 percent of scientists� agree on the current climate change narrative, but there seems to be no hard evidence to back up that statement, and with so many of the world�s top scientists in the field speaking up against �climate alarmism,� sometimes it seems to be the other way around.
Ivar Giaever, a Norwegian-American physicist who shared the Nobel Prize in Physics in 1973, compares current climate science to pseudoscience. The �97 percent� tagline is often used to demonize those who question anthropogenic induced climate change, and the mainstream media will do their best to make those who question it, no matter their background, credentials, or credibility, look foolish. Hundreds of the world�s most reputable scientists are and have been speaking out about this politicization of climate science for many years, and a similar trend has emerged across the sciences, particularly in medicine. �Peer-reviewed� science was monopolized long ago, and is now plagued with falsities. �The case against science is straightforward: much of the scientific literature, perhaps half, may simply be untrue. . . . Science has taken a turn towards darkness.� Dr. Richard Horton These �skeptical scientists,� as they are commonly referred to, are often made to look like complete quacks by mainstream media, all for the purpose of making it seem ridiculous, stupid, and downright outrageous to question the mainstream narrative of climate change.
Dr Richard Lindzen, among many others, refers to this type of narrative as hysteria, and argues that climate scientists raising this issue have been demonized. He�s one of the world�s top experts in the field and lead author of �Physical Climate Processes and Feedbacks,� Chapter 7 of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change�s Third Assessment Report on climate change. He is a dynamical meteorologist with interests in the broad topics of climate, planetary waves, monsoon meteorology, planetary atmospheres, and hydrodynamic instability. His research involves studies of the role of the tropics in mid-latitude weather and global heat transport, the moisture budget and its role in global change, the origins of ice ages, seasonal effects in atmospheric transport, stratospheric waves, and the observational determination of climate sensitivity. He has made major contributions to the development of the current theory for the Hadley Circulation, and pioneered the study of how ozone photochemistry, radiative transfer, and dynamics interact with each other. He is also the Emeritus Sloan Professor of Meteorology at Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
In many of his lectures, he has pointed out how policymakers were heavily involved with the IPCC and their publications. He is one of many to do so. You can learn more about him and view his publications and CV.